Brighteye Recommends: The $200bn blue collar staffing market ripe for AI disruption

Michael Stothard from firstminute capital (in a previous life, Michael was the founding Editor at Sifted), has written a fascinating deep dive into one of the hottest corners of AI: staffing.

We looked into the direction of travel in this space earlier in the year. You can find our write-up and market map here. We looked closely at how AI is assisting with identifying and assessing talent, screening and bias reduction, and onboarding.

In Michael's review of the space, the growth numbers he shares are impressive - for example, Mercor racing to $75m in just two years.

It raises the questions: i) how sustainable is this pace and ii) will we see rapid consolidation once the market gets too crowded?

What really caught our eye was the focus on blue-collar and frontline staffing. The thesis makes a strong case that this is where AI can really shine - phone-first, SMS-based, instant response hiring for roles where speed matters most. We share a similar thesis that AI solutions stand to positively impact recruiting for SMBs and for decentralised teams. Still, a question does remain: specifically in industries built on trust and word-of-mouth referrals, will job seekers embrace AI-led hiring, or could the “human touch” become the real differentiator?

We also liked (and agreed with!) the point on defensibility through proprietary data. It feels accurate that LinkedIn scraping alone won’t be a winning play. But we are also of the view that compliance and worker experience might also be underrated moats.

Could European players, for instance, win by leaning into regulation-friendly, worker-first approaches while U.S. rivals primarily chase scale?

Finally, the big strategic question: will the breakout winners be specialist, vertical-first companies (healthcare, logistics, early-career) or generalists that stitch multiple verticals together under one platform?

Michael’s article gives us plenty of food for thought. If the funding and revenue figures posted by leading companies in the space are anything to go by, this is only the beginning.

You can read the full firstminute capital blog here. Thanks to Michael and the team for their collaboration.

---

Below, we have summarised the key areas of alignment with our earlier work on AI solutions in the hiring space.

1. Talent identification & matching

The thesis emphasises how AI tools, from sourcing to automated interviews, are being used to scale hiring rapidly. These tools offer deep candidate matching capabilities, much like the "talent identification" segment in our framework, where AI analyses inferred skills and aligns candidates with dynamic roles.

The staggering pace of ARR growth clearly reflects product-market fit. But how sustainable is this growth, especially once the novelty wanes or acquisition costs rise?

2. Screening, bias, & ethical considerations

Our March article emphasised that AI-powered screening can reduce bias, if designed with oversight, transparency, and periodic audits.

The thesis from firstminute echoes this potential but takes it further, suggesting that proprietary data and vertical focus (e.g., blue-collar recruiting) may offer real defensibility. In highly-regulated regions, could compliance and explainability become stronger competitive moats than raw reach or speed of growth?

3. Onboarding & productivity

We described how AI-enhanced onboarding can accelerate ramp-up by 20–30%, delivering personalised training while avoiding information overload.

The article doesn’t call out onboarding, but the urgency in sectors like blue-collar, where speed is everything, suggests that AI-driven onboarding could become a critical competitive advantage, too. Does this open a strategic white‑space for startups to build tightly integrated hiring → onboarding solutions? It's something on which we will keep an eye.

4. Market differentiation & white-space

Our original piece introduced a number of white-space opportunities, such as AI-powered career agents that serve candidates directly, or tools focusing on passive talent.

The article's focus on blue-collar staffing, frontline roles, and vertical specialisation reads like a real-world example of this strategy. He highlights how AI aligns naturally with high-volume, phone-first hiring, often underserved by typical recruitment tech.

Could blending both approaches (vertical-first platforms and career-focused AI agents) create especially defensible models...?

We look forward to finding out.

Read the original post here.